Cross sections for the γ p → K ∗ 0 + reaction at E γ = 1 . 7 – 3 . 0 GeV
نویسندگان
چکیده
I. Hleiqawi,1 K. Hicks,1 D. S. Carman,1,32 T. Mibe,1 G. Niculescu,20 A. Tkabladze,13 M. Amarian,26 P. Ambrozewicz,11 M. Anghinolfi,17 G. Asryan,37 H. Avakian,32 H. Bagdasaryan,26 N. Baillie,36 J. P. Ball,2 N. A. Baltzell,31 V. Batourine,21 M. Battaglieri,17 K. Beard,20 I. Bedlinskiy,19 M. Bellis,4 N. Benmouna,13 B. L. Berman,13 A. S. Biselli,4 S. Bouchigny,18 S. Boiarinov,32 R. Bradford,4,* D. Branford,10 W. J. Briscoe,13 W. K. Brooks,32 S. Bültmann,26 V. D. Burkert,32 C. Butuceanu,36,† J. R. Calarco,24 S. L. Careccia,26 B. Carnahan,6 S. Chen,12 P. L. Cole,15 P. Collins,2 P. Coltharp,12 D. Crabb,35 H. Crannell,6 V. Crede,12 J. P. Cummings,27 R. De Masi,7 R. De Vita,17 E. De Sanctis,16 P. V. Degtyarenko,32 L. Dennis,12 A. Deur,32 C. Djalali,31 R. Dickson,4 G. E. Dodge,26 J. Donnelly,14 D. Doughty,8,32 M. Dugger,2 S. Dytman,29 O. P. Dzyubak,31 H. Egiyan,32,‡ K. S. Egiyan,37 L. Elouadrhiri,32 P. Eugenio,12 G. Fedotov,23 G. Feldman,13 R. Fersch,36 R. Feuerbach,4 M. Garçon,7 G. Gavalian,26,‡ G. P. Gilfoyle,30 K. L. Giovanetti,20 F. X. Girod,7 J. T. Goetz,3 A. Gonenc,11 R. W. Gothe,31 K. A. Griffioen,36 M. Guidal,18 N. Guler,26 L. Guo,32 V. Gyurjyan,32 R. S. Hakobyan,6 J. Hardie,8,32 D. Heddle,8 F. W. Hersman,24 M. Holtrop,24 C. E. Hyde-Wright,26 Y. Ilieva,13 D. G. Ireland,14 B. S. Ishkhanov,23 M. M. Ito,32 D. Jenkins,34 H. S. Jo,18 K. Joo,9 H. G. Juengst,26 N. Kalantarians,26 J. D. Kellie,14 M. Khandaker,25 K. Kim,21 W. Kim,21 A. Klein,26 F. J. Klein,6 A. V. Klimenko,26 M. Kossov,19 Z. Krahn,4 L. H. Kramer,11,32 V. Kubarovsky,27 J. Kuhn,4 S. E. Kuhn,26 S. V. Kuleshov,19 J. Lachniet,26 J. M. Laget,32,§ J. Langheinrich,31 D. Lawrence,22 J. Li,27 K. Livingston,14 H. Y. Lu,31 K. Lukashin,32 M. MacCormick,18 S. McAleer,12 B. McKinnon,14 J. McNabb,4 B. A. Mecking,32 M. D. Mestayer,32 C. A. Meyer,4 K. Mikhailov,19 R. Minehart,35 M. Mirazita,16 R. Miskimen,22 V. Mokeev,23 K. Moriya,4 S. A. Morrow,7,18 M. Moteabbed,11 G. S. Mutchler,28 E. Munevar,13 P. Nadel-Turonski,13 R. Nasseripour,31 S. Niccolai,18 I. Niculescu,20 B. B. Niczyporuk,32 M. R. Niroula,26 R. A. Niyazov,32 M. Nozar,32 M. Osipenko,17,23 A. I. Ostrovidov,12 K. Park,21 E. Pasyuk,2 C. Paterson,14 J. Pierce,35 N. Pivnyuk,19 O. Pogorelko,19 S. Pozdniakov,19 B. Preedom,31 J. W. Price,5,‖ Y. Prok,35,¶ D. Protopopescu,14 B. A. Raue,11,32 G. Riccardi,12 G. Ricco,17 M. Ripani,17 B. G. Ritchie,2 F. Ronchetti,16 G. Rosner,14 P. Rossi,16 F. Sabatié,7 C. Salgado,25 J. P. Santoro,32,34,** V. Sapunenko,32 R. A. Schumacher,4 V. S. Serov,19 Y. G. Sharabian,32 E. S. Smith,32 L. C. Smith,35 D. I. Sober,6 A. Stavinsky,19 S. S. Stepanyan,21 S. Stepanyan,32 B. E. Stokes,12 P. Stoler,27 I. I. Strakovsky,13 S. Strauch,31 M. Taiuti,17 S. Taylor,1 D. J. Tedeschi,31 U. Thoma,32,†† R. Thompson,29 L. Todor,4 S. Tkachenko,26 C. Tur,31 M. Ungaro,9 M. F. Vineyard,33 A. V. Vlassov,19 K. Wang,35 L. B. Weinstein,26 D. P. Weygand,32 S. Whisnant,20 M. Williams,4 E. Wolin,32 M. H. Wood,31,‡‡ A. Yegneswaran,32 L. Zana,24 J. Zhang,26 B. Zhao,9 and Z. Zhao31 (CLAS Collaboration) 1Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA 2Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504, USA 3University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1547, USA 4Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA 5California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, California 90747, USA 6Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064, USA 7CEA-Saclay, Service de Physique Nucléaire, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 8Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA 9University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 10Edinburgh University, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdom 11Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA 12Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA 13George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA 14University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom 15Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209, USA 16INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, I-00044 Frascati, Italy 17INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 18Institut de Physique Nucleaire ORSAY, Orsay, France 19Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, RU-117259, Russia 20James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA 21Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, South Korea 22University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA 23Moscow State University, General Nuclear Physics Institute, RU-119899 Moscow, Russia 24University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824-3568, USA 25Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504, USA 26Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA 27Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590, USA 28Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA 29University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
منابع مشابه
Inclusive Production of ρ0,K∗0 and φ Mesons at HERA
The production of ρ(770)0, K∗(892)0 and φ(1020) mesons is studied in non-diffractive photoproduction processes at HERA using events measured with the H1 detector. The corresponding average γ p centre-of-mass energy is 210 GeV. The mesons are reconstructed in the rapidity range | ylab |<1 and transverse momentum range 0.5 < pT < 7 GeV. The differential cross sections are measured as a function o...
متن کاملPreprint CNP - 95 / 18 Astrophysical S - factor of the 7 Be ( p , γ ) 8 B reaction from Coulomb dissociation of 8 B ∗
The Coulomb dissociation method to obtain the astrophysical S-factor, S 17 (0), for the 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B reaction at solar energies is investigated by analysing the recently measured data on the breakup reaction 208 Pb(8 B, 7 Be p) 208 Pb at 46.5 MeV/A beam energy. Breakup cross sections corresponding to E1, E2 and M 1 transitions are calculated with a theory of Coulomb excitation that includes t...
متن کاملar X iv : h ep - p h / 97 11 36 6 v 1 1 8 N ov 1 99 7 406 : Jet Production in DIS at NLO Including Z and W Exchange
Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for 1-jet and 2-jet cross sections in deep inelastic scattering with complete neutral current (γ and Z) and charged current (W) exchange are presented. Electroweak effects in DIS n-jet production are known to become important for Q > ∼ 2500 GeV . These effects can be studied with the fully differential ep → n jets event generator mepjet [1, 2] which allows ...
متن کاملar X iv : n uc l - th / 0 30 50 39 v 1 1 4 M ay 2 00 3 Models for photo - and electro - production of K + in view of new data
Predictions of isobaric and Regge models are compared with the latest experimental data (Bonn, JLab) to select among the models those providing a satisfactory description of the data. Only the Saclay-Lyon (SLA) and MAID models are in a reasonable agreement with both photo-and electro-production data ranging up to about E lab γ = 2.5 GeV. In this energy region the Regge model is suitable only fo...
متن کاملMg * in the Splitting Of
The 28 Si(p,p ′ γ 0 X) 24 Mg reaction has been studied at the ITEP accelerator by the hadron-gamma coincidence method for a proton energy of 1 GeV. Two reaction products are detected: a 1368.6-keV γ-ray photon accompanying the transition of the 24 Mg * nucleus from the first excited state to the ground state and a proton p ′ whose momentum is measured in a magnetic spectrometer. The measured di...
متن کاملHow Well Does Qcd Work for Photon-photon Collisions?
The performance of QCD in describing hadronic photon-photon collisions is investigated in the light of recent measurements from LEP on di-jet production, light hadron transverse momentum spectra, and heavy quark production. Differential di-jet cross sections have been measured by DELPHI 1 and OPAL 2. DELPHI has analysed 220 pb −1 of data taken at √ s ee =192-202 GeV using a cone algorithm with ...
متن کامل